|
|
Saturday 9th Nov 2002
Concert at St Cyprian's Church, Glentworth Street, London NW1. Now also
available on CD.
Programme notes: copyright Kristian Hibberd 2002.
I - Allegro II - Andante III - Allegro
The year 1957 saw the completion of the two works in tonight's concert.
Shostakovich had been speaking of a proposed Eleventh Symphony since at least
April 1955 but had begun work on it only in late 1956. The composer finished
the symphony by the end of 1957, despite having penned his Second Piano
Concerto within that time.
The concerto is the last, and most significant, of the pedagogical works
Shostakovich wrote for his children. When his eldest offspring, Galina, began
learning the piano Shostakovich would write short pieces for her to master one
at a time. Six of these pieces (written between 1944 and 1945) were published
as his `Children's Notebook', Op. 69, with a seventh piece, written for her
ninth birthday in 1945, later added to the collection. Whereas Galina decided
to make biology her profession - eventually enrolling at the Biology faculty of
Moscow University - Maxim committed himself entirely to the study of music and
the piano. While studying at the prestigious Moscow Central Music School
(affiliated with, and a preparation for, the Moscow Conservatoire) the 16 year
old Maxim was presented with the one movement `Concertino for Two Pianos', Op.
94. He gave the first performance of the work on 8 November 1954 at the Music
School with a classmate, Alla Maloletkova.
In many ways the Piano Concerto No. 2 represents Maxim's coming of age. The
work bears a formal dedication (joining such prestigious names as Evgeny
Mravinsky, Ivan Sollertinsky and David Oistrakh, soon to be joined by Mstislav
Rostropovich and Galina Vishnevskaya) and it was on the strength of his
performance of the work that Maxim gained entrance into the Moscow
Conservatoire. Of the three pedagogical works this concerto is the most
serious, immediately becoming a staple part of Shostakovich's own concert
repertoire.
The first performance was given by Maxim, on his nineteenth birthday (10 May
1957), in the Great Hall of the Moscow Conservatoire, with the USSR State
Symphony Orchestra under Nikolai Anosov. In a letter to the composer Edison
Denisov Shostakovich complained that the work had no redeeming artistic merits,
yet the critics of the day praised it for its `charming simplicity, carefree
spirit and lyrical warmth'. And David Rabinovich, one of the first biographers
of Shostakovich, suggested that the concerto `shows the composer as though his
own youth had returned to him'.
The work itself strays little from the formal archetype of an 18th-Century
concerto - in three movements with a sonata form opening Allegro, a slow middle
movement and a brisk climactic finale. One particularly idiosyncratic feature
of the work is the pervasive use of bare octaves in the piano part, as if the
work were conceived largely for a single-voiced instrument.
The first movement follows a concentrated and conventional sonata form structure
and displays much of the octave piano writing that is a defining feature of the
work. Perhaps the one bona fide cadenza of the entire concerto appears in this
movement, just before the recapitulation, and is a development of the piano's
opening theme in the manner of a Bach two-part invention.
The second movement is scored for piano and strings in the style of a
Rachmaninov soliloquy. A movement of simplicity and clarity, this is perhaps
one of Shostakovich's purest, most lyrical and affecting utterances. The
finale follows seamlessly with the aid of a motivic link and returns
immediately to the spirit of youthful humour, mischief and piano octaves.
I - `Palace Square': Adagio II - `9 January': Allegro III - `In Memoriam': Adagio IV - `Tocsin': Allegro non troppo
The uprising begins... Fighting in the streets, barricades, salvos, cannons.
In rivers of blood begins the civil war for liberty. (Vladimir Ilyich Lenin)
In an atmosphere of increasing dissatisfaction with the autocratic rule of
Russia by Tsar Nicholas II, 9 January 1905 witnessed a huge demonstration by
workers and their families in the square outside the Winter Palace in St.
Petersburg. An essentially peaceful protest turned into a massacre as Russian
troops opened fire on the defenceless crowd, killing hundreds.
In 1956, on the occasion of his 50th birthday, Shostakovich wrote an
autobiographical sketch for the journal `Sovetskaya Muzyka' (`Soviet Music').
In concluding the article he wrote the following statement:
I am presently working on my Eleventh Symphony... The theme of this symphony
is the Revolution of 1905. I love this period in the history of our
Motherland, which found clear expression in workers' revolutionary songs. I
don't know whether I will quote these songs extensively in my symphony, but its
musical language, undoubtedly, will be close in character to the Russian
revolutionary song.
In the event Shostakovich used a number of revolutionary songs, but rather than
importing them as alien utterances, the themes are woven seamlessly into the
fabric of the work. For contemporaneous Soviet critics this made for `a work
of enormous realistic power'. In a discussion of the symphony at a Union of
Composers meeting in Moscow one critic remarked:
Thanks to its extensive use of the revolutionary song heritage, the language of
this symphony proved to be simpler and more accessible than in previous major
works of the composer while remaining, at the same time, deeply individual.
Shostakovich's Symphony No. 11 scored a huge success for the composer and, in
many respects, redeemed him after his failure to pay appropriate homage to the
30th anniversary of the October Revolution 10 years earlier. Indeed, such a
positive response had not been received by a major work of Shostakovich since
the premiere of his Symphony No. 7 in 1942. The work was premiered in Moscow
on 30 October 1957 (the 40th anniversary of the October Revolution) and
received the Lenin Prize in 1958.
The programmatic content of this symphony is most clearly manifested in the
descriptive titles given to each movement. The first movement, `Palace
Square', pictures the snow-covered square outside the Winter Palace in the
middle of winter. Employing two 19th-century political songs, `Listen!' and
`The Prisoner', Shostakovich considered this movement more of an introduction,
setting the scene for what follows. The second movement, `9 January', a
depiction of the `Bloody Sunday' massacre by Russian troops, introduces two
themes from the sixth movement of Shostakovich's `Ten Choral Poems on
Revolutionary Texts' of 1951.
The third movement, `In Memoriam', is a lament for those who lost their lives in
the massacre, employing the revolutionary funeral march `You Fell a Victim' -
the song that accompanied Lenin's burial in 1924 - leading to the finale,
`Tocsin', in which the heroic march style predicts ultimate victory for the
revolutionaries.
Unlike his oratorio `Song of the Forests' (Op. 81, 1949), Shostakovich did not
approach the symphony as simply a propagandistic potboiler. The work is a vast
symphonic canvas; each movement played without a break and unified through the
use of shared motivic ideas. Although on one level the work recalls events
specific to the 1905 revolution, it has been noted by many commentators that it
also carries more global significance, evoking not only this revolution but all
revolutions. As Boris Schwarz wrote, Shostakovich's 11th Symphony `is more
reflection on a theme than a description of a theme'.
Last modified by Martin Watts,
18:25:45 07-Sep-2003
|